Blood Collection Tubes And Their Effect On Antimicrobial Resistance
Blood collection tubes are a critical component of the healthcare system, as they are used to obtain blood samples for various diagnostic tests. However, recent studies have shown that the type of tube used for blood collection can have a significant impact on antimicrobial resistance. In this article, we will explore the different types of blood collection tubes and their effect on antimicrobial resistance.
Types of Blood Collection Tubes
There are several types of blood collection tubes commonly used in healthcare settings. Some of the most common types include:
1. Serum Tubes
Serum tubes are used to collect blood samples for tests that require serum, such as glucose and cholesterol tests. These tubes do not contain any anticoagulants, which allows the blood to clot and separate from the serum.
2. Plasma Tubes
Plasma tubes are used to collect blood samples for tests that require plasma, such as coagulation studies. These tubes contain anticoagulants that prevent the blood from clotting, allowing the plasma to be separated from the blood cells.
3. EDTA Tubes
EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) tubes are used to collect blood samples for tests that require whole blood, such as complete blood counts. EDTA is a powerful anticoagulant that prevents the blood from clotting by binding to calcium ions.
Effect of Blood Collection Tubes on Antimicrobial Resistance
Recent studies have shown that the type of blood collection tube used can have a significant impact on antimicrobial resistance. This is because certain additives in the tubes can affect the growth of bacteria in the blood samples, leading to inaccurate test results and potentially inappropriate treatment.
1. Anticoagulants
Anticoagulants, such as EDTA and heparin, are commonly used in blood collection tubes to prevent clotting. However, these additives can also inhibit the growth of bacteria in the blood samples, leading to false-negative results in antimicrobial susceptibility tests.
One study found that blood samples collected in EDTA tubes showed lower growth rates of bacteria compared to samples collected in plain tubes. This can lead to underestimation of the true bacterial load in the sample, resulting in inappropriate antibiotic treatment.
2. Gel Separators
Some blood collection tubes contain gel separators that separate the serum or plasma from the blood cells after centrifugation. While these separators are effective in reducing clotting, they can also trap bacteria and inhibit their growth in the sample.
A study published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology found that blood samples collected in gel separator tubes had lower recovery rates of bacteria compared to samples collected in plain tubes. This can result in false-negative results in antimicrobial susceptibility tests, leading to inappropriate antibiotic therapy.
Recommendations for Blood Collection
Based on the evidence presented, it is important for healthcare providers to consider the potential impact of blood collection tubes on antimicrobial resistance when choosing the type of tube for blood collection. Here are some recommendations to minimize the effect of blood collection tubes on antimicrobial resistance:
Use plain tubes for blood cultures to avoid the potential inhibitory effects of anticoagulants and gel separators on bacterial growth.
Consider using alternative collection methods, such as swabbing or needle aspiration, for blood samples that are suspected to be contaminated with bacteria.
Perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing on multiple blood samples collected using different types of tubes to ensure accurate results.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the type of blood collection tube used can have a significant impact on antimicrobial resistance. Healthcare providers should be aware of the potential inhibitory effects of anticoagulants and gel separators on bacterial growth in blood samples. By following the recommendations outlined in this article, healthcare providers can minimize the effect of blood collection tubes on antimicrobial resistance and ensure accurate test results for appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Disclaimer: The content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only, reflecting the personal opinions and insights of the author(s) on phlebotomy practices and healthcare. The information provided should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease, and those seeking personal medical advice should consult with a licensed physician. Always seek the advice of your doctor or other qualified health provider regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room immediately. No physician-patient relationship is created by this web site or its use. No contributors to this web site make any representations, express or implied, with respect to the information provided herein or to its use. While we strive to share accurate and up-to-date information, we cannot guarantee the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of the content. The blog may also include links to external websites and resources for the convenience of our readers. Please note that linking to other sites does not imply endorsement of their content, practices, or services by us. Readers should use their discretion and judgment while exploring any external links and resources mentioned on this blog.
